Bink.nu Services

Subscribe to our feed 

 


Order Now!

Windows 7 for XP Professionals
Updating Support Skills from XP to Windows 7
by Bink.nu's Raymond Comvalius

Who is online

There are 88 guest(s) online.

There are 0 member(s) online.

Sponsors



Archives

Posted by Steven Bink May 10, 2007 5:27 PM with 4 comment(s)
Filed under:
Microsoft does it again, promise great cool features and even demo them. They let us wait for months/years and then just drops the cool stuff for a "future release" [:@]. Just like the Windows Server team did with R2 at the time.
 
They drop nearly all the great selling points in Viridian: No live Migration, no hot add of anything[W], CPU core limit drops from 32 to 16.

Well lets hope they will get it ready in Longhorn Server SP1.
Till then long live Vmware ESX! [I]

Today Microsoft announced that a beta version of Windows Server virtualization will be available with the release to manufacturing (RTM) version of the next-generation of Windows Server, codename "Longhorn," in the second half of the year. This pre-production version of Windows Server virtualization will allow a broad set of customers and partners to familiarize themselves with this important part of Windows Server "Longhorn," and begin testing workloads and applications in high availability/disaster recovery, server consolidation, dynamic datacenter, and test and development scenarios. A final, production version of Windows Server virtualization is scheduled to be released within 180 days of the release of Windows Server "Longhorn."

"So we had some really tough decisions to make.  We adjusted the feature set of Windows Server virtualization so that we can deliver a compelling solution for core virtualization scenarios while holding true to desired timelines. Windows Server virtualization is a core OS technology for the future, and we chose to focus on virtualization scenarios that meet the demands of the broad market – enterprise, large organizations, and mid-market customers. We continue to offer great technology and successful strategies for enterprise customers by broadly investing in the several areas.

So we are making the following changes, and postponing these features to a future release of Windows Server virtualization:
·         No Live migration
·         No hot-add resources (storage, networking, memory, processor)
·         Support limit of 16 cores/logical processors (e.g., 2 processor, quad-core systems is 8 cores; or 4 processor, quad-core system is 16 cores)

Full Story At Source to read what other cool features do get in.[8-|]
7180 Views

Comments

 

GP007 said:

Is this a deadline thing?  Which I figure it is.  Still though, it's a beta version with RTM Server, and then the final 180 days later,  probably with SP1 or maybe even before SP1?  I don't see it as a big problem,  they didn't drop things right?  They just delayed some features until later.
May 10, 2007 10:58 PM
 

johlos said:

Every presentation I've seen so far about Windows Server Virtualization (WSV) has said that it would release "Within 180 days of RTM of Windows Longhorn Server", so while the start of the beta has been pushed back, the RTM hasn't changed (or at least, is still within the announced window).

The postponing of the live migration, hot-add of resources, & limiting to only 16 cores/processors is a shame, but as users, would we rather see it released w/o these features, or delayed quite a bit longer?   Personally, I'd vote for released w/o those features.   (Though I wish I could remember what "Live migration" was...)

May 11, 2007 12:04 AM
 

Ap0kalipSe said:

I assume i'm reading this right in that they are to be dropped from the rtm release and not just the beta?

They have dropped the one feature i *really really* wanted, and that's live migration!! :( - i guess they give no indication of when this 'future release' will be.

I've been holding off doing large scale virtualisation here till ws08 ships with virtualisation, and i saw live migration as a key feature of that project to try and eliminate downtime across vm's due to hardware/host maintenance, and they go and fooking strip it out. Grrrr!

P.S. You spelt Microsoft wrong in the title :P
May 11, 2007 11:57 AM
 

lustyd said:

So, apart from the price, why would anyone choose this over ESX?

without live migration, why would I choose this over VMWare Server (Free)?

I like Microsoft a lot, but I sure as heck won't be using a product just because they tell me to!
May 11, 2007 2:48 PM

About Steven Bink

Founder of Bink.nu
Bink.nu 3.0. Copyright © 1999-2012 Steven Bink. All Rights Reserved.
Microsoft and Microsoft logo's are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.