Bink.nu Services

Subscribe to our feed 

 


Order Now!

Windows 7 for XP Professionals
Updating Support Skills from XP to Windows 7
by Bink.nu's Raymond Comvalius

Who is online

There are 98 guest(s) online.

There are 0 member(s) online.

Sponsors



Archives

Posted by Ryan Hoffman February 15, 2005 5:39 PM with 16 comment(s)
Filed under:

Everyone who said there was going to be no IE7 is now.. wrong.  This letter was delilvered to Featured Community Site Owners today:

Featured Community Site Owners,

Today at RSA, Bill Gates talked about Internet Explorer 7. As the guy responsible for IE, I wanted to say a couple of things about it.

First, some basics: we’re committing to deliver a new version of Internet Explorer for Windows XP customers. Betas of IE7 will be available this summer. This new release will build on the work we did in Windows XP SP2 and (among other things) go further to defend users from phishing as well as deceptive or malicious software.

Why? Because we listened to a lot of customers, analysts, and business partners. We heard a clear message: “Yes, SP2 makes the situation better. We want more, sooner. We want security on top of the compatibility and extensibility IE gives us, and we want it on XP. Microsoft, show us your commitment.” 

I think of today’s announcement as a clear statement back to our customers: “Hey, Microsoft heard you. We’re committing.”

Why are we talking about it today? Because our customers have asked us, with increasing urgency, what our plans are. We want to convey our intentions to our customers clearly and in a timely way.

I’ve gotten questions about the ship date. We know that feedback from customers and partners is crucial. We’re going to release a beta and listen, then refresh the beta and listen some more. We’ll ship when the product is right.

I’ve gotten other questions about support for Windows 2000. Right now, we’re actively listening to our major Windows 2000 customers about what they want and comparing that to the engineering complexity of that work. That’s all I can say on that topic.

Please know that the IE team is working hard. We’re eager to improve and better secure the web experience for the hundreds of millions of IE users around the world. We delivered on XP SP2. We are actively delivering on our part of a great 64-bit Windows client.  We continue to deliver on security updates for customers who have not moved to XP SP2. We’re going to deliver on IE7.

Dean Hachamovitch

General Manager, IE Core Development Team

9540 Views
Source: In House

Comments

 

Mr. Dee said:

Bink, you gotta feel victimized after this announcement. You preached about no IE 7 for XP, now look. If I were you, I probably wouldn't make another prediction as long as I live.

No one knows the future of Microsoft products but its creators, but I have feeling we won't be seeing Longhorn anytime soon.

February 15, 2005 1:14 PM
 

Ryan Hoffman said:

I don't agree.  Our predictions were right for what we knew at the time.  Sure, we were wrong, but that's okay.  They are predictions - not absolute roadmaps.

February 15, 2005 1:44 PM
 

Viv said:

I think it would be right this way.

Bink.nu was right in its assessment about no IE 7 for XP, but Microsoft was wrong in its assessment that the IE users wont need IE 7 until Longhorn.

And thus we reach here.[;)]

ps. i agree with you Tek.Especially because, in the software world even the best laid out and publicised plans for a certain period ahead could be completely overturned and nullified by what happens the next second after final decision making by the creators.

February 15, 2005 2:07 PM
 

Steven Bink said:

IE7 was never planned before this announcement even in December 2004, Micosoft declined working on a new IE7.

 

This is a new dicission/strategy.

 

Bink.nu was not wrong...

February 15, 2005 4:01 PM
 

Exile said:

Resident Chupala con CACA!!

[:D]

February 15, 2005 5:28 PM
 

xMorpheousx416 said:

No...site news here is delivered hot off the presses.  Even I followed up on several leads all pointing to IE7 not becoming a reality.

As per my other comment, MS has been known to change it's mind at the last minute on several major topics...

As far as IE7 goes for me, well....it's too late..hehe, I am already in love with FF.  But, I do hope that MS will continue to support W2K.  It's a great OS.
February 15, 2005 6:37 PM
 

Dortoh said:

Wow, well if Bink was "wrong" so was Bill Gates :)  Plans change, thankfully sometimes they even change for the better!

[Y]
February 15, 2005 8:10 PM
 

xpclient said:

Bink.nu was merely predicting. Anyways, why argue now? Isn't IE7 coming good news? What people should really have demanded for was Windows 2000 SP5. [:(]
February 15, 2005 11:25 PM
 

michielonline said:

No bill wasn't wrong! 640K should be enough for everyone!! :D

I think they changed their mind because of FireFox. It's slowly biting away from IE's user base... If they waited until longhorn was released FF will have won the second browser war.

February 16, 2005 3:09 AM
 

stepfaul said:

I have been using IE6 since it's release and have not had any problems - yeah sure patches and updates have been installed but that's the way things are sometimes.

I installed FF and used it for a month and was impressed with the tabbed browsing but came accross quite a few sites where content was not displayed properly. Personally, I have reverted back to IE, it has served me well all these years.

A new version is good news as far as I am concerned.[:)]

February 16, 2005 6:35 AM
 

missionballer said:

i am with stepfaul on this   i tried FF for about a month, and some sites i visited did not display properly or gave me redirection errors.  The tabbed browsing was nice and some of the extensions were too, but im back to IE now, cant wait to jump onboard IE7.

 

February 16, 2005 7:27 AM
 

Spy said:

If you like FF features but IE compatability, use Avantbrowser, it's awesome.

That said, this is a good (albeit reactionary) move from MS and I am glad they are going with it.  Let's hope they go with standards and tabs!!!
February 16, 2005 7:33 AM
 

m0gely said:

"I installed FF . . . but came accross quite a few sites where content was not displayed properly"

You mean you came accross quite a few sites in which IE is much more forgiving when view badly coded pages, or pages that were more specifically coded for IE, or pages coded w/o any thought given to browsers other than IE.
February 16, 2005 3:02 PM
 

stepfaul said:

Well I am glad that IE is more forgiving, this amounts to a more pleasurable browing experience for me!

I do agree that some of the pages I visited using FF where coded without thought to what browser might have been used and were geared towards IE.

As stated, I was happy with FF but am happier with IE, if people choose to criticise IE because of it's flaws I would say reverse the situation and make FF the dominent browser and see how many flaws people would have found in FF over the years. 

  

February 17, 2005 4:43 AM
 

kaller said:

Hmm.  The reason that some sites dont work except in IE is that the IE6 browser is below the standards and has prorietary features.  FF simply allows you to follow the accepted standards.
So yes you need to use the IE browser for some non-standard sites but that will change as these bad sites play catchup.  In fact IE7 will NEED to follow the standards properly, same as Firefox. So dont throw away that FF browser, instead email the offending web sites and let them know they are non-conforming.

February 17, 2005 3:57 PM
 

leed said:

" So yes you need to use the IE browser for some non-standard sites but that will change as these bad sites play catchup."

Spot on....hopefully IE7 will address this, frustrating, issue.

I use FF, because when i build for FF, i can be sure ill need minor tweaking of the CSS etc to cross all browsers and platforms...and a well built, standards based app..can and will display propoerly in IE.

Cmon MS, at least try and make IE7 a proper browser....
February 18, 2005 5:36 AM
Bink.nu 3.0. Copyright © 1999-2012 Steven Bink. All Rights Reserved.
Microsoft and Microsoft logo's are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.