Bink.nu Services

Subscribe to our feed 
Alerts 
 


Order Now!

Windows 7 for XP Professionals
Updating Support Skills from XP to Windows 7
by Bink.nu's Raymond Comvalius

Who is online

There are 83 guest(s) online.

There are 0 member(s) online.

Sponsors



February 2007 - Posts

Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 9:45 PM with 8 comments
Filed under:
Microsoft just released a Windows Vista Patch.

A client computer that is running Windows Vista registers an old IP address when the GUID of a network adapter changes

When the GUID of a network adapter changes on a client computer that is running Windows Vista, the computer registers an old IP address that was associated with the old GUID.

The client computer also registers new IP addresses that are associated with the new GUID. However, because the client computer registers old IP addresses, another client computer may try to use the old IP address. If the old address is not valid, a connection failure may occur.

Update for Windows Vista for x64-based Systems (KB929451)

Update for Windows Vista (KB929451) 
20083 Views
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 9:22 PM with no comments
Filed under:
Mike Neil – GM Virtualization.

“Microsoft believes the claims made in VMware’s whitepaper contain several inaccuracies and misunderstandings of our current license and use policies, our support policy and our commitment to technology collaboration.  We believe that we are being progressive and fair with our existing licensing and use policies and creating a level playing field for partners and customers.  We are deeply committed to providing high-quality technical support to our customers who are utilizing virtualization technology.  In addition, we are committed to working collaboratively with industry leaders to foster an environment of interoperability and cooperation that best serves our customers.

“We believe it's better to resolve VMware’s claims between our two companies so that we can better serve customers and the industry. EMC is a long-time partner of Microsoft. We've extended this courtesy to VMware due to our mutual customers and partnership with EMC. We are committed to continuing to collaborate with VMware as we have been doing on regular basis. Consistent with this, Microsoft believes that we will be able to accommodate a mutually agreeable solution between our two companies and clear up any existing misunderstanding with regard to the points raised in the whitepaper.”

15987 Views
Source: In House
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 1:43 PM with 12 comments
Filed under:
Robert McLaw:

Of all the FUD that's out there about Vista, the false information about Vista's DRM is the FUD that frustrates me the most. I read this article from Peter Gutmann, and was infuriated. I wanted to write a point-by-point rebuttal, but was overwhelmed with the sheer number of glaring inaccuracies, as well as the overwhelming feeling that I was in danger of being hit in the head by a piece of falling sky. It wasn't so much of a research paper as it was a ridiculous story full of melodramatic hyperbole.

Well, I'm glad someone finally called it out for what it was. George Ou, an IT blogger on ZDNet, blasts security guru Bruce Schneier for quoting Peter Gutmann in his anti-Vista tirade. He even sheds new light on Mr. Gutmann:

[Update 4:25 PM - The researcher who Bruce Schneier cites who in turn is widely cited in the media as an expert on why Vista DRM is so evil actually admits to never actually even touching Windows Vista.  That's the level of "research" he did.]

I guess that's how research is done at the University of Auckland.

Full Story At Source
15633 Views
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 11:28 AM with 15 comments
Filed under:

Pirillo: Windows Vista Im'breaking up with you. No, seriously. When I know I have time, I’m “upgrading” from Windows Vista to Windows XP.

I stand by my original assertion that the shipping version of this OS is late beta, at best. I realize that other enthusiasts are leaving Windows altogether (and leaping instead to Apple’s OS X), but there’s not yet enough momentum behind my willingness to do that. I’ll leave the installs of Vista 32 and 64 on this PC, but I’ll spend most (if not all) of my time back in tried-and-true Windows XP.

I’ll give Vista a second chance when the first service pack is released later this year, but until then…

  1. My scanner doesn’t really work. The software hasn’t caught up yet, and won’t be available until SP1 time-frame. The software works like a charm in XP - amazingly well, as a matter of fact.
  2. Windows Movie Maker crashes on a regular basis.
  3. My IPFax software doesn’t work (the driver will likely never be updated to be Vista-compliant). Never, EVER caused me a problem in XP. I need this software to work, and dual-booting to use it is not an option. 0
  4. Continue At Source
16589 Views
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 10:50 AM with 2 comments
Filed under:
Arian noted that Windows 2003 post SP2 hotfixes appearing in KB's. He wonders is SP2 is gold then. Well no, it is not yet done, but it is in RC stage, so no more fixes get in the SP. Bug fixes that are now made will be part of SP3, but I'm sure by then MS decides to cancel SP3 and come up with some crappy roll-up pack. [;)]

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931310

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931134

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931311
20302 Views
Source: Bink.nu Forum
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 10:46 AM with 4 comments
Filed under:

For centuries people assumed that economic growth resulted from the interplay between capital and labor. Today we know that these elements are outweighed by a single critical factor: innovation.

Innovation is the source of U.S. economic leadership and the foundation for our competitiveness in the global economy. Government investment in research, strong intellectual property laws and efficient capital markets are among the reasons that America has for decades been best at transforming new ideas into successful businesses.
 
The most important factor is our workforce. Scientists and engineers trained in U.S. universities -- the world's best -- have pioneered key technologies such as the microprocessor, creating industries and generating millions of high-paying jobs.

But our status as the world's center for new ideas cannot be taken for granted. Other governments are waking up to the vital role innovation plays in competitiveness.

This is not to say that the growing economic importance of countries such as China and India is bad. On the contrary, the world benefits as more people acquire the skills needed to foster innovation. But if we are to remain competitive, we need a workforce that consists of the world's brightest minds.

Two steps are critical. First, we must demand strong schools so that young Americans enter the workforce with the math, science and problem-solving skills they need to succeed in the knowledge economy. We must also make it easier for foreign-born scientists and engineers to work for U.S. companies.

Education has always been the gateway to a better life in this country, and our primary and secondary schools were long considered the world's best. But on an international math test in 2003, U.S. high school students ranked 24th out of 29 industrialized nations surveyed.

Our schools can do better. Last year, I visited High Tech High in San Diego; it's an amazing school where educators have augmented traditional teaching methods with a rigorous, project-centered curriculum. Students there know they're expected to go on to college. This combination is working: 100 percent of High Tech High graduates are accepted into college, and 29 percent major in math or science. Contrast that with the national average of 17 percent.

To remain competitive in the global economy, we must build on the success of such schools and commit to an ambitious national agenda for education. Government and businesses can both play a role. Companies must advocate for strong education policies and work with schools to foster interest in science and mathematics and to provide an education that is relevant to the needs of business. Government must work with educators to reform schools and improve educational excellence.

American competitiveness also requires immigration reforms that reflect the importance of highly skilled foreign-born employees. Demand for specialized technical skills has long exceeded the supply of native-born workers with advanced degrees, and scientists and engineers from other countries fill this gap.

This issue has reached a crisis point. Computer science employment is growing by nearly 100,000 jobs annually. But at the same time studies show that there is a dramatic decline in the number of students graduating with computer science degrees.

The United States provides 65,000 temporary H-1B visas each year to make up this shortfall -- not nearly enough to fill open technical positions.

Permanent residency regulations compound this problem. Temporary employees wait five years or longer for a green card. During that time they can't change jobs, which limits their opportunities to contribute to their employer's success and overall economic growth.

Last year, reform on this issue stalled as Congress struggled to address border security and undocumented immigration. As lawmakers grapple with those important issues once again, I urge them to support changes to the H-1B visa program that allow American businesses to hire foreign-born scientists and engineers when they can't find the homegrown talent they need. This program has strong wage protections for U.S. workers: Like other companies, Microsoft pays H-1B and U.S. employees the same high levels -- levels that exceed the government's prevailing wage. Continue At Source

15089 Views
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 12:11 AM with no comments
Filed under:

CEO Steve Ballmer details commitment to Gulf region, part of Microsoft’s 2007 Unlimited Potential global program investments of $55 million.

Q&A: As healthcare-technology specialists gather in New Orleans, Microsoft experts discuss new information technologies designed to provide lower costs, better outcomes and improved access to care.

Medstory’s intuitive technology designed to improve access to health information and empower consumers to make better-informed health decisions.

Industry best practices and standards-based framework is available for download today, hosted on the newly launched MSDN Healthcare Industry Center.

Deployment of centralized Web-based document bank with integrated forms management and workflow ultimately frees up more time for patient care.

14512 Views
Source: In House
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 12:08 AM with 2 comments
Filed under:
A new public milestone, Beta 2, is available for System Center Configuration Manager 2007:

We are pleased to announce that Configuration Manager 2007 (SMSv4) Beta 2 is now available! You can download the build here:

https://connect.microsoft.com/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?SiteID=16&DownloadID=5509

Please be sure to review the release notes and updated documentation provided in the bundle. In addition to other pre-requisites, you will need the Release Candidate version of WSUS 3.0, available on Microsoft Connect through the Windows Server Update Service 3.0 Beta Site

Regards,
The Configuration Manager 2007 Customer Team


Operations Manager 2007 Pre-RTM Build
It seems that the Operations Manager product team is almost finalizing RTM for System Center Operations Manager 2007. Tonight they posted an "IDS build" called build 4941 to the Microsoft Connect website for their TAP and RDP customers:

2/20/2007  4941  OpsMgr 2007 Final Pre-RTM "lab only" Build. Please use this build of OpsMgr in your test labs only unless specifically authorized by the OpsMgr product team. There is NO support for upgrade from RC2 to this IDS build. There is NO support for IDS to RTM upgrade. The only supported upgrade path is RC2 to RTM.


Managed Services Solution (SCE and OpsMgr) Now Available

 The System Center Essentials team is very pleased to announce the availability of the Release Candidate 1 software on the Microsoft Connect site. With the release of SCE RC1 in conjunction with Operations Manager 2007 RC2 you can now test providing managed services to your customers. This solution provides a single entry point for remote management over the internet for customers' server and client environments, leveraging Operations Manager 2007 as the service provider console.

This solution includes:
Support for remote management services over the internet without requiring a VPN
Remote Managed Services management pack
Customer centric service provider views and reports
Diagnostic tasks to troubleshoot problems remotely
Support for remote monitoring and centralized update management, software distribution and software and hardware inventory

To evaluate the System Center "Remote Managed Services" public beta, you will install Operations Manager 2007 RC2 at your service provider data center to provide the top-tier management experience and Essentials 2007 RC1 at your customer locations as the remote end-point for monitoring the customer's environment. To Download: Continue At Source



The System Center Essentials team is very pleased to announce the availability of the Release Candidate 1 software on the Microsoft Connect site. We encourage you to promptly download and start testing this exciting release of SCE! What's New in Essentials RC1?

Capabilities:

Support for upgrading from WSUS 2.0 and 3.0

Emailed Daily Health Report

Automatic scheduled discovery of computers from Active Directory

Enhanced network monitoring of SNMP-enabled network devices including a network topology diagram view

Remote Control support for remote control of managed client and server computers

Ability to import Update catalogs from third-party software publishers

SQL Services based reporting on monitoring, hardware and software inventory

Setup experience improvements for SQL Server selection and file locations

More management packs including support for Exchange 2003, Dynamics CRM 3.0, and Active Directory

Full Story At Source

15456 Views
Source: www.techlog.org
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 12:04 AM with 2 comments
Filed under:
Mike Neil is General Manager Virtualization at Microsoft, he posted a blog post after the NY Times article:

Virtualization has long been a core part of server operating systems and this dynamic market is enjoying a fresh round of innovation.  These new technologies will help customers reduce costs, make IT more flexible, and enable vendors to offer more services.   Microsoft believes the best approach for customers lies in establishing a foundation of cooperation between vendors, which is why we strive to regard virtual machines and virtualization technology the same way.  Windows server licensing offers a level playing field to all.  To encourage interoperability, we openly share technology and have published a set of APIs for all our commercially available virtualization products today and provided documentation on APIs for the hypervisor that will be part of the next version of Windows Server, codenamed Longhorn.  We desire open dialog among industry vendors and will talk with any company wishing to discuss licensing for future products. More information on Microsoft’s virtualization strategy can be found on the Windows Server blog at http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/02/25/Where-we_2700_re-headed-with-virtualization.aspx
15649 Views
Posted by Steven Bink on February 27 2007, 12:01 AM with 2 comments
Filed under:

Microsoft is "trying to restrict customers' flexibility and freedom to choose virtualization software by limiting who can run their software and how they can run it."

Those are the charges levied by Microsoft virtualization competitor VMware, which over the past few days, has come out swinging against Microsoft.

On the heels of a New York Times profile of the company and its many complaints against Microsoft, VMware posted a white paper to its Web site that detail its gripes, which range from licensing terms, to closed programming interfaces and formats. (The white paper is dated February 23, but seems to have been made public some time after The Times story was published.)

"Microsoft is leveraging its ownership of the market leading operating system and numerous applications that are market leaders in their respective categories (Exchange, SQL Server, Active Directory) to drive customers to use Microsoft virtualization products. Their tactics are focused on software licensing and distribution terms (for SQL Server, Exchange, Windows Server, Vista) and through the APIs and formats for virtualized Windows," the white paper continued.

Among VMware's specific charges:

• "Microsoft has posted language that restricts use of their VHD-formatted VMs (“VHDs”) to MS Virtual Server and/or Virtual PC only (as opposed to VMware products, which also run VHDs)."

• "Microsoft is strictly enforcing their VHD format on users and ISVs as a closed ecosystem and not allowing compatibility or translation with other formats."

• "Recent changes in Microsoft licensing have taken a negative stance on mobility and virtualization. These new Microsoft licensing policies ask for permanent assignment of operating system licenses to hardware and then restrict the movement of those operating system licenses, even for virtualized environments that can be moved seamlessly from machine to machine."

• "Microsoft has recently announced a prohibition on virtualizing the less expensive versions of Vista (Vista Home Basic and Vista Home Premium)." Microsoft also is limiting the number of times virtualized environments can be moved to different machines, and what kinds of content (anything "protected by Microsoft digital, information, or enterprise rights management technology" can be virtualized.

• "Microsoft has developed proprietary APIs (including but not limited to what Microsoft calls “Enlightenments”) for Longhorn that manage communication between Windows and Microsoft’s hypervisor. Microsoft disclosed these API specifications at the WinHEC conference in June 2006, but is not permitting use of these APIs by other virtualization vendors or open source projects. The one exception is Novell, which agreed to give Microsoft critical operating system intellectual property rights and ongoing payments to Microsoft in return."

Continue At Source
15687 Views
Source: blogs.zdnet.com
Posted by Steven Bink on February 26 2007, 11:55 PM with 14 comments
http://www.showusthecode.com/: Your repeated claims that Linux violates Microsoft's intellectual property has come to the attention of the Linux community. Not only that, but it's been reported Microsoft has convinced businesses to pay for a Linux patent that you can't provide.

Therefore, this website will serve as a response to this accusation, and within it, a request.   The request is simple, since you, Microsoft, claim to be so sure of yourself: Show Us the Code.  Show us the Code and Show Us the Patents.  Lets make this crystal clear.

If Linux developers are made aware of the code and patented ideas, then the code can be omitted and Linux can re-write necessary aspects of the kernel or operating system.  This is a fairly simple request and common courtesy. Why wave around lawsuit threats, threats that will cost Microsoft in a court room as well as the defendants? It lacks logic, especially when you consider that there are developers around the world who would be more than happy to work with Microsoft to resolve this issue. Don't you owe it to your shareholders to work with others to ensure their intellectual property isn't being violated?

Also, we were under the impression you wanted to work with the open source community. That's what Port 25 is all about isn't it?  That's what the Novell deal is about, correct?  Here's your chance.  If you're right you'll silence thousands upon thousands of open-source advocates  and make your competitors scramble for ways to not violate your IP. Continue At Source

This was already posted by SPY yesterday [:$] But since there are comments on this post too I'll leave it.
15965 Views
Posted by Steven Bink on February 26 2007, 11:50 PM with 4 comments
Filed under:
Didn't know Windows Paint was capable of this.

18099 Views
Source: In House
Posted by Spy on February 25 2007, 2:46 AM with 1 comment
Filed under:
Microsoft is "very interested" in the Ruby programming language and also plans to expand its Expression design tools line, a Microsoft official said this week.

During an Internet chat with InfoWorld, Forest Key, Microsoft director of Web and client user experience marketing for the company's developer division, acknowledged Ruby is on the company's radar screen. Asked if the company would accommodate the Ruby on Rails Web framework, which is based on Ruby, in Expression, Key said, "Ruby is currently more of a 'developer' concept for us."

"We are very interested in Ruby and have lots of thinking going on," but nothing to announce at this time, Key said. He advised chatters to "stay tuned."

Key added he was not the Microsoft person to comment in detail on this subject because he did not know the company’s plans. One chatter expressed wishes for an IDE for Ruby on Rails from Microsoft.

Continue At Source
19444 Views
Posted by Spy on February 25 2007, 2:44 AM with no comments
Filed under:
Avowed computer aficionado Alina Libova said her buddies kept pestering her with questions about Windows Vista, Microsoft's new computer operating system.

So what did the 17-year-old Mountain View High School senior decide to do?

Why, throw a Vista Party, of course.

For 500 people.

With Microsoft picking up the tab.

Registration for the shindig starts at 9:30 a.m. today at Foothill Community College in Los Altos Hills. Experts from Microsoft and elsewhere will lead workshops on topics including how to integrate Vista with mobile devices such as cell phones and how the new operating system can boost the computer game experience.

Alina said the event came together as ``kind of a chain reaction.''

The daughter of a computer architect at Polaris Wireless and a midwife at El Camino Hospital, Alina first met up with Microsoft officials last year while attending an event the company organized. The day was designed so a few dozen high-achieving Bay Area high school students could meet with the company's computer scientists and mathematicians in the hope of maybe someday working for Microsoft.

``I didn't give any specification other than the kids should have an aptitude and interest in math and science,'' said Microsoft media spokesman Doug Free, who said attendees were urged to keep in touch.

Continue At Source
15258 Views
Posted by Spy on February 25 2007, 2:43 AM with no comments
Filed under:
In a direct challenge to Adobe, Microsoft Corp. said on Friday that three major news publishers -- Associated Newspapers Ltd., Forbes Inc. and Hearst Corp. -- are planning to develop their own digital reader applications using Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) display technology.

Hearst Corp. already has a beta version of its news reader for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the "P-I Reader," ready and available for download.

"At Hearst, we are constantly looking for new ways to reach our readers," said George B. Irish, president of Hearst Newspapers, in a statement. "It is clear that digital delivery and consumption are critical to the future success of the newspaper industry. We are very excited to be collaborating with Microsoft on this new application. We are delighted to begin the development of this technology in Seattle and intend to expand to our other major newspaper markets in the near future."

The P-I Reader has been designed for use online or offline, and can store up to six days of archived news content. The reader formats text and images according to screen size and lets users navigate pages using a keyboard. It works with any Windows Vista or Windows XP computer and Microsoft say it plans to broaden support to other devices, including those running Apple's Mac OS in the future.

A fourth newspaper, The New York Times, introduced a proprietary reader based on Microsoft's technology last November.

Continue At Source
14403 Views
Page 1 of 13 (191 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Bink.nu 3.0. Copyright © 1999-2010 Steven Bink. All Rights Reserved.
Microsoft and Microsoft logo's are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.