Bink.nu Services

Subscribe to our feed 
Alerts 
 


Order Now!

Windows 7 for XP Professionals
Updating Support Skills from XP to Windows 7
by Bink.nu's Raymond Comvalius

Who is online

There are 282 guest(s) online.

There are 0 member(s) online.

Sponsors



Posted by Spy November 12, 2006 8:46 AM with 5 comment(s)
Filed under:
Ever since Microsoft Vista chief Jim Allchin talked about his son not using anti-virus in a recent teleconference with journalists, the world has been abuzz with claims Vista won’t need AV software. Now Jim Allchin has clarified his statements on the official Windows Vista Blog.

The speed with which news stories appeared on tech sites around the world claiming that Jim Allchin said words to the effect that his seven year old son didn’t need anti-virus on his computer has shocked the Vista chief.

To counter the endless news stories, his official Vista blog carries a clarifying statement about what he actually said. To paraphrase, he explained that his son was able to use Vista without AV protection because it was locked down with parental controls, meaning no instant messaging, email or other common vectors of attack, and this coupled with Vista improved security model meant that it was possible to run without AV in this kind of heavily locked down situation.

Jim then said that most users will need to run anti-virus software for all the usual reasons.
You can click on the link above, but here’s Jim’s post in full:

Wow, you describe a specific situation and suddenly people extrapolate something completely different!  During a recent discussion with journalists about the release to manufacturing for Windows Vista, I made a comment about how attacks on the Internet are getting more and more sophisticated, and some of the security features in Windows Vista really help our customers.

This somehow morphed into people thinking I said customers shouldn’t use antivirus software with Windows Vista. When the articles and blogs started appearing, I asked the PR folks to send me a copy of the transcript of the call so I could read it over and see if I said something I didn’t mean.

After reading the transcript, I could certainly see that what I said wasn’t as clear as it could have been, and I’m sorry for that. However, it is also clear from the transcript that I didn’t say that users shouldn’t run antivirus software with Windows Vista!

In fact, later in the call, I explicitly made this point again, because I had realized I wasn’t as clear as I should have been. It’s important for me that our customers are using the appropriate security solutions for the right situations, whether that’s security functionality integrated in the operating systems, or add-on products.

Continue At Source

757 Views

Comments

 

schwit said:

A house with the best locks still needs a security system if it's in a bad neighborhood.
November 12, 2006 5:29 PM
 

GoodThings2Life said:

I can't really say I haven't heard this situation before... a person makes a statement about one specific situation that is somehow interpreted by the masses (thanks to the press) as being an all-encompassing end-all-be-all generalization. It's been going on for eons... I mean, just look at Paul's letters and theology to the early Christians.

Mind you, it was a really stupid thing for Allchin to say, and he realizes it now, but the press always jumps at the chance to mangle the meaning behind what people say. It's largely a way to gain people's attention, and I blame readers for not reading this stuff in its entirety for a deeper understanding than just a headline.
November 13, 2006 6:33 AM
 

GoodThings2Life said:

PS-- I'm not Christian bashing, btw... just pointing out that many people (of any belief) misinterpret a lot of what he says.
November 13, 2006 6:34 AM
 

Andrewft65 said:

PS-- I'm not Christian bashing, btw... just pointing out that many people (of any belief) misinterpret a lot of what he says.

Glad you cleared that one up ;-)
November 13, 2006 11:33 AM
 

bluvg said:

I'll repost what I posted at Activewin:

This is at best a case of reporting on reporting, and at worst a deliberate misinterpretation. No one who heard that actual interview would have made such a comment. These aren't garden-variety journalists listening to this--they cover tech for a living, and there is no excuse for this.  Allchin isn't changing his story about anything--he's being unfair to himself in his "clarification" post.  He was VERY clear about what he said, and as he said, he specifically reiterated the conditions under which he was not running anti-virus at home, and that he did not endorse not using anti-virus. 

There is a better write-up of it here: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061111-8199.html

November 13, 2006 6:09 PM

About Spy

Hello world, as they say. I'm in Melbourne Australia and work as a Systems Administrator. I go to work every day with a smile on my face as I just love my work. Our company works across 30+ sites around the state so I travel a bit. We use mostly MS products, IBM hardware and 100% Cisco networking...it's a sweet mix for sure. I've been around Bink's site since it's inception way back when it was just a group on the MS site...that was a while ago. Bink.nu is the leading source of Microsoft news on the web that's for sure and I love being a part of Steven's team. Anyway, hope you enjoy the site.
Bink.nu 3.0. Copyright © 1999-2010 Steven Bink. All Rights Reserved.
Microsoft and Microsoft logo's are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.